Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (6) TMI 43

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,52,807 in the assessment year 1974-75 being the commission amount received by the assessee-firm subsequent to the dissolution ? 2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the assessee was following only cash system of accounting with regard to the commission receipts is based on valid and relevant materials and is sustainable in law ? " The assessee, Revathi Agencies, was a firm of four partners which carried on business in the purchase and sale of electrical goods. It had also acted as a distributing agent for electrical manufacturers and received commission. The said partnership firm was evidenced by a deed of partnership entered into on April 1, 1962. On February 24, 1974, the four partners a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner was of the view that the assessee was following the method of accounting on receipt basis for commission and due basis for disbursement since its inception, and held that the commission which was received during (sic) the assessment year under consideration cannot be taxed in the assessment since the assessee was following the accounting method on cash basis. He accepted the assessee's contention that it followed a mixed system of accounting. He, therefore, held that it is not open to tax the sum of Rs. 1,52,807 on due basis in the current assessment year even though the business was dissolved at the end of the accounting ye....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ders, the Income-tax Officer came to the conclusion that the assessee was regularly following the mercantile system of accounting. Therefore, the commission due to the assessee amounting to Rs. 1,52,807 accrued during the accounting year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, viz., 1974-75, should be treated as income of the firm for the assessment year 1974-75. The Income-tax Officer after going through the earlier assessment orders demonstrated that the assessee was accounting for the commission due to it on accrual basis. Therefore, according to the Income-tax Officer, the assessee is not entitled to change the method of accounting for the present assessment year under consideration from the mercantile system of accounting ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng to learned standing counsel, when the Income-tax Officer after going through the assessment order relating to the earlier assessment years came to the conclusion that the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting, without assigning any reason to differ with the finding given by the Income-tax Officer, the Tribunal, mainly on the basis of the balance-sheet and the statement showing the amounts received from Bijlee Products, came to the conclusion that the assessee is following the cash system of accounting. It was further submitted that the assessee itself admitted that it was following the mercantile system of accounting for expenditure and cash system of accounting for receipt of commission. So, it was submitted that it....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e to the conclusion that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting, and, therefore, the impugned addition cannot be sustained for the assessment year under consideration. Therefore, it is only after considering the sufficient materials on record, both the Appellate Assistant Commissioner as well as the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the addition is not sustainable. We have heard learned standing counsel appearing for the Department as well as learned counsel appearing for the assessee. We have already set out the facts in detail. The assessee was a partnership firm under a partnership deed dated April 1, 1962. It was dissolved by a deed of dissolution dated February 24, 1974, with effect from March 31, 1974. Subseque....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... According to the Tribunal, the assessee was not showing the commission receipts in the balance-sheet during the assessment year under consideration. Therefore, the assessee was not following the mercantile system of accounting. In a statement filed before the Tribunal it was shown that the assessee was doing major business with Bijlee Products and the commission received from Bijlee Products was shown on receipt basis. Therefore, the assessee was following the cash system of accounting according to the Tribunal. We have also given our anxious thought over this matter. We have gone through the entire records relating to the assessee. It remains to be seen that the Income-tax Officer on a perusal of the earlier assessment orders came to the ....