TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (4) TMI 885
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, AOR, Mr. Nitesh Ranjan,Adv., Mr. Amritesh Raj,Adv., Mr. Piyush Singh,Adv. And Mr. Vaibhav Shrivastava,Adv. JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C)..CC Nos. 10531 - 10532 of 2013. 1. The Appellant was enrolled as an advocate in the Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh in July, 1988. He applied for transfer of his enrolment to the State of Rajastha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n was dismissed by a learned Single Judge by holding that the Appellant was not entitled for enrolment. In the Appeal filed against the said judgment of the learned Single Judge, a Division Bench directed the Bar Council of Rajasthan to consider the application filed by the Appellant without being influenced by the observations made by the learned Single Judge. 3. The Bar Council of Rajasthan dis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of the Enrollment Rules, Bar Council of Rajasthan framed under Section 28 (1) (d) read with Section 24 (1) (e) of the Advocates Act, 1961. The said Rule was struck down by the High Court of Rajasthan by judgment dated 19th August, 2008. Taking into account the earlier order dated 16th January, 2000 by which the application for enrolment filed by Appellant was rejected, the Bar Council of Rajasthan....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s by the Government of Himachal Pradesh. In the affidavit filed in Special Leave Petitions (Civil)..CC Nos. 10531-10532 of 2013, the Appellant stated that a FIR registered against him at Police Station Dhambola on 15th April, 1988. He was arrested and sent to judicial custody. He further stated that he was absent from service without obtaining leave for which reason his services were terminated by....