2019 (4) TMI 795
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....meem Akther For the Petitioner : S.R.R. Viswanath For the Respondents : M. Govind Reddy, Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes ORDER (PER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN) Challenging the order of assessment passed under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act, 2005, on various grounds, such as limitation, lack of opportunity etc., the dealer has come up with the above writ ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... contended by Mr. M. Govind Reddy, learned Special Standing Counsel that the non-supply of these copies would not be fatal to the impugned order, since the petitioner has to fail by his own pleadings. Drawing our attention to the judgment of this Court in Venkateswara Chemicals v. Government of Andhra Pradesh 2001 124 STC 515 (AP), it is contended by the learned Special Standing Counsel that wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re, we are unable to accept the said contention. 7. Insofar as the question of limitation is concerned, the learned Special Standing Counsel invited our attention to the decision of the Constitutional Bench in S.C. Prashar v. Vasantsen Dwarkadas 1962 STPL 2826 (SC). But, we do not wish to get into the same at this stage, as we are of the view that the matter can be remanded back on a short grou....
TaxTMI