2019 (4) TMI 791
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....6/1/15, 2161/1/15, 2165/1/15, 2162/1/15, 2163/1/15 and 2164/1/15) instituted by the second respondent in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate, each alleging offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on the averments, inter alia, of there being no payment tendered or made in spite of notices of demand issued by the complainant upon dishonor of certain cheques which had been issued in his favour against the account of a company Amira Pure Foods Pvt. Ltd., also an accused in the said cases, vicarious liability having been attributed to the petitioner on the allegations of he being in charge of, and responsible for, the day-to-day affairs of the said company, he also having statedly participated in certain acts of commis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....es of the meeting of the board of directors of the company accused held on 01.02.2010 reflecting one Rajesh Arora to be the executive director of the company to whom the requisite responsibilities had been entrusted. 4. Per contra, the respondent (complainant) by way of counter affidavit has submitted that the petitioner is guilty of suppression of facts and projecting false and baseless contentions and submissions. It is pointed out that in contrast to the claim of he being an NRI, there is material to show that the petitioner has also been residing in New Delhi. It is pointed out that he is the director of the company accused having the largest stake and has been wholly in charge of and responsible for the conduct of its business, ther....
TaxTMI