2018 (10) TMI 1665
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....airperson And MR Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) For The Appellant : Mr. Vivek Tankha, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mayank Bughani, Mr. Prashant Sivarajan, Mr. Naveen Chawla, Advocates. For The Respondent : Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, Mr.Siddharth Nath, Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Krishnayan Sen, Advocates ORDER The Appellant challenged the ord....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ril, 2015 filed by Respondent before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi). The main argument advanced is that the two Assignments are of two different dates, which were produced before the authorities and, therefore, there is doubt about the Assignment made in favour of the Respondent. 3. It is further submitted that the account of the Corporate Debtor never become ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....not be looked into by the Adjudicating Authority while deciding the application under Section 7 or by this Appellate Tribunal, till the Corporate Debtor alleges the same and raise the objection under Section 65 of the Code. No such plea has been taken by the Corporate Debtor before the Adjudicating Authority alleging fraud on the part of the Financial Creditor for initiation of proceedings under S....
TaxTMI