Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 348

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Accountant Member For the Appellant : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, Addl. CIT ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The present stay petition is filed by the assessee seeking stay of demand of Rs. 4,91,49,730/- for the Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. It is submitted that the demand in question had arisen on account of ALP adjustmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....balance demand. 2. On the other hand, the Ld. Sr. DR vehemently opposed the stay petition. 3. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The assessee could not make out a strong prima facie case on the receipts of addition to the returned income. However, considering the fact that the appellant already paid Rs. 2 crores out of the original demand of Rs. 6,91,49,730/-,....