Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (2) TMI 25

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1961, for calling for a reference and in pursuance of that, this reference was called for by this court and the following question of law has been referred by the Tribunal for answer of this court, which reads as under : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee-firm was entitled to renewal of registration ? " The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....return of income for the assessment year 1978-79 (relevant previous year : Diwali, 1977), on June 28, 1978. There was a declaration in Form No. 12. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Income-tax Officer noticed that the said declaration was signed by three partners, viz., S/Shri Lahrumal, Manghandas and Harishchand and by one Smt. Vindharbai, the widow of Matarmal, who had died on Jun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd perused the records. Apparently, the view taken by the Tribunal does not appear to be correct. The Tribunal relied on a decision of the Allahabad High Court given in Badri Narain Kashi Prasad v. Addl. CIT [1978] 115 ITR 858 [FB] but that decision has already been overruled by the Supreme Court in Wazid Ali Abid Ali v. CIT [1988] 169 ITR 761 ; AIR 1988 SC 757 and not only the Full Bench decision....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate of the death of the deceased partner invalid. Income-tax Reference No. 163 of 1970, dated February 22, 1972 (All) reversed. Girdharilal Nannelal v. CIT [1984] 147 ITR 529 ; [1984] Tax LR 114 (MP) [FB] overruled. On the death of partner and the inclusion of his son there was a change in the constitution of the firm. Death did not dissolve the firm but brought about a change in the constitution ....