2019 (3) TMI 1383

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have been filed by the assessee on the following grounds : (i) In paragraph number 15.5 of the Final Order No.41891-41896/2018 dt. 29.06.2018, the appeal number has been recorded as Appeal ST/41748/2015 (Paragraph 15.5. is extracted below) "15.5 Appeal ST/41748/2015 - Demands and penalties confirmed/imposed in the impugned order are set aside and appeal is allowed in toto." It is submitted that the appeal number is repeated in Paragraph 15.5 which is a typographical error and the correct Appeal number is ST/42180/2017. (ii) The petitioner further submits that, tabulation provided under Paragraph 4 (page number 7) of the Final Order No.41891-41896/2018 dated 29.06.2018, the following error have crept in : The relevant p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nds in respect of both Karnataka Housing Board (Rs.2,47,91,740/-) and Bangalore Development Authority (Rs.2,41,05,111) had been indicated, however in para-4, page 7 of the order, the said table does not feature the particulars concerning "Bangalore Development Authority" (BDA). The Ld. Advocate therefore prays for rectification of these mistakes. 3.1 On the other hand, on behalf of Revenue, Ld. A.R Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy points out that with regard to the first issue, he has no objection to the same. 3.2 However, with regard to non-inclusion of details concerning Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), he submits that although in para 10.1 the heading does indicate BDA, however, in the list of projects given immediately thereafte....