Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (12) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ive hostel meant for stay of the company executives during their official tour is not allowable as per section 37(4) read with section 37(5) of the Act ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal ought to have found that the expenditure on rent being allowable under section 30 of the Act is excluded from the purview of expenditure to be considered for allowance under section 37(1) of the Act and as such from the purview of section 37(4) of the Act ? " In I. T. R. No. 88 of 1994 at the instance of the Revenue, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for opinion of this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also for the reasons stated in the enclosure t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or clearing memorial plaques given by the foreign collaborator in the memory of the assessee's late managing director can be considered as having been incurred for commercial expediency and for the purpose of business since the plaques were exhibited only in the company's premises. As far as the maintenance of the guest house was concerned the Tribunal took the view that the amount spent on repair of the guest house has to be excluded in considering the amount disallowable under section 37(4) of the Act. Question No. 2 referred in I. T. R. No. 88 of 1994 is connected with the questions referred in I. T. R. No. 85 of 1994. Learned counsel for the assessee contended that the Tribunal has committed an error in disallowing its claim ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, by whatever name called, maintained, hired, reserved or otherwise arranged by the assessee for the purpose of providing lodging or boarding and lodging to any person (including any employee or, where the assessee is a company, also any director of, or the holder of any other office in the company), on tour or visit to the place at which such accommodation is situated, is accommodation in the nature of a guest-house within the meaning of sub-section (4). " A reading of sub-section (4) and more clarified by sub-section (5) would clearly show that any accommodation by whatever name called, maintained, hired, reserved or arranged by the assessee for providing boarding or lodging to any person on tour or visit to the place at which such ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd that the amount spent on such repairs has to be ascertained by the Income-tax Officer. Learned standing counsel for the Revenue submits that the above finding of the Tribunal is erroneous. We find merit in this contention. The very maintenance of a guest house in the nature of the one described in section 37(4) and (5) is hit by the provisions of section 37(4). Any expense incurred for repair of such guest house would not be allowable. An attempt was made by learned counsel for the assessee to contend that what has been interdicted under sub-section (4) is expenditure for maintenance of the guest house and, therefore, the expenditure for repair of the guest house would not come within the purview of sub-section (4). We have no hesitation....