2019 (3) TMI 716

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i For the Appellant Mrs. Kavitha Podwal, Superintendent (AR) For the Respondent ORDER Per: S.S GARG Appellants have filed these four appeals against different impugned orders all dated 29.8.2016 whereby the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeals of the appellant and upheld the Orders-in-Original. Since the issue involved in all the four appeals is identical, therefore, all the four appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llment of export obligation, the Original Authority vide Order No.62/2015 dated 21.12.2015 confirmed a short levy of duty amounting to Rs. 4,14,274/- (even though total duty saved amount as per the license is Rs. 4,90,185/-, there is an unutilized duty portion of Rs. 75,911/-) along with applicable interest in respect of the goods imported against the EPCG Authorization. Aggrieved by the Order-in-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....obligation for the reasons beyond their control such as non-receipt of funds in time from the Ministry of Food Processing Industries. It is his further submission that in such a situation the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel comes into operation and the respondent is restrained from taking punitive action against the defaulter. 5. On the other hand, the learned AR defended the impugned orders and ....