Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (10) TMI 1433

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er (T) Shri Prem Ranjan Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri H. Saini, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Justice Satish Chandra, President]. - Both the appeals are filed against Order-in-Appeal Nos. 38-39/2014, dated 7-4-2014. The period of dispute is 9-2-1997 to January, 2002. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period under consideration the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was supplied exclusively to M/s. Hindustan Sanitary Ware Industries. No such seat-cover was sold in the open market. He also submits that the final packing material was supplied by the Hindustan Sanitary Ware Industries. Finally, the material was packed under the supervision of the recipient and handed over to the M/s. Hindustan Sanitary Ware Industries. The labelling was done by the appellant exc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or to the judgment (supra). When it is so then the ratio will not be applicable. The case will have to be decided as per the then law. 6. By considering the rival submissions and on the perusal of the record, we are of the view that the appellant was doing a job work/manufacturing exclusively for M/s. Hindustan Sanitary Ware Industries. No such item was sold in the market or third party. T....