Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 1553

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Government scheme known as 'State Rural Electrification Programme' run by the Government of Uttar Pradesh. The appellant during the period relevant for the purposes of the present appeal were availing the benefit of exemption in terms of Notification No.74/1993-CE dated 28.02.1993 which grants exemption from whole of excise duty to the goods manufactured when the same are manufactured in the factory belonging to state government and intended to use by any department of the government. 2. The appellant's factory was visited by the Central Excise officers on 11.12.2014 who seized 2660 PCC Poles on the ground that the benefit of the Exemption Notification is not available to them, inasmuch as the appellant cannot be called to be a sta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a but the same did not cease to be a State Government undertaking or a corporation owned or controlled by State Government and hence they were eligible for full exemption in terms of Notification No74/93-CE dated 28.02.1993. The said decision of the Tribunal was affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported as Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad V/s M/s Electricity Pole Manufacturing- 2001 (129) E.L.T. A-311 (S.C.). As a result of the said decision the appellant continued to avail the exemption. However, it is seen that subsequently the correctness of the said decision was doubted and the issue was referred to the Larger Bench of the Tribunal. The Tribunal's Larger Bench in their decision reported as Assistant Engineer (Civil) P.C.C....