2019 (2) TMI 1222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Senniappan in all W.Ps. For the Respondents : Mrs.G.Dhana Madhri Government Advocate (T) in all W.Ps. COMMON ORDER These writ petitions are filed challenging the orders of assessment dated 28.03.2018 passed in respect of assessment years 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. 2.The main grievance of the petitioner against these im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tire proceedings. 3. On the other hand, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents contended that when the notice of proposal was issued, the petitioner did not file their reply. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is left with no other option except to conclude the assessment. 4. Heard both sides. 5. It is seen from the impugned orders that the same has resulted out of an inspe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sal. In this case, it has not been done so. However, since the Assessing Officer has also not considered the objections raised by the petitioner before the Enforcement Officials, this Court is of the view that the interest of justice would be met by passing the following order. 7. Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside and they are, in turn, shall be ....