2019 (2) TMI 1192

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r dated 14.5.2018 of the Ld. CIT(A), Meerut pertaining to assessment year 2009- 10 on the following grounds:- 1. That the penalty of Rs. 1,27,226/- imposed and confirmed by CIT(A) is against the facts and law and liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee. 2. That the AO as well as CIT(A) has not considered the case laws quoted by the assessee, hence, CIT(A) is in error in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amounting to Rs. 1,27,266/- vide order dated 10.10.2017 and aggrieved with the said penalty order, the assessee appealed before the Ld. CIT(A), who vide his impugned order dated 14.5.2018 has dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Against the impugned order, assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 3. During the hearing, Ld. counsel for the assessee has stated that the cash deposited by the as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eceived in this case wherein it was stated that assessee having cash deposit of Rs. 17,75,600/- and AO completed the assessment after considering the replies and held that Rs. 7,28,400/- was unexplained income u/s. 69A of the Act. The matter travelled to Ld. CIT(A) and ITAT who vide their respective orders dated 22.12.2016 and 6.6.2017 confirmed the addition and consequently, the AO imposed the pe....