2019 (2) TMI 971
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....shan Kaul JJ. For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, AOR, Mr. N. Sai Vinod, Adv., Mr. Dhananjay Baijal, Adv., Mr. Divyanshu Rai, Adv. And Mr. Naveen Hegde, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : None ORDER Heard Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, learned counsel for the appellants. The respondents have been served, but from the inception of the special leave petition in the year 2007, none has been appearing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion to the view expressed in Ammonia Supplies Corporation (P) Ltd. vs. Modern Plastic Containers Pvt. Ltd. and Others (1998) 7 SCC 105, to canvass the proposition that while examining the scope of Section 155 (the predecessor to Section 111), a view was taken that the power was fairly wide, but in case of a serious dispute as to title, the matter could be relegated to a civil suit. The submission....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wer conferred by or under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, by the Tribunal or the Appellate." The effect of the aforesaid provision is that in matters in respect of which power has been conferred on the NCLT, the jurisdiction of the civil court is completely barred. It is not in dispute that were a dispute to arise today, the civil suit remedy would be completely barred....
TaxTMI