Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 857

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad and IOCL Asoj. The appellants are clearing the goods through pipelines. At the time of clearance of the goods through pipelines, the quantity dispatched is ascertained by dip rod method. Once the product is received at the other end of the pipeline, at the destination, the quantity is once again ascertained by the recipient in the presence of appellants representation by dip rod method. The duty was paid by the appellant on the quantity is ascertained at the recipient storage tank by dip rod method. The SCN was issued to the appellant demanding Central Excise duty on the quantity dispatched in respect of the aforesaid four products. While demanding the duty the quantification was done by considering only those consignments where the quan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gineering Pvt. Ltd. 2004 (168) ELT 34 • CCE vs Hindustan Zinc 2010 (261) ELT 435 3. Ld. Counsel also relied on the decision in their own case vide Order No. A/12095/2018 dated 05.10.2018. 4. Ld. AR relies on the impugned order. He argued that the appellants are required to discharge duty on the quantity cleared by them. He argued that there is no suo moto provision for adjustment of central excise duty paid by the appellant in excess against the duty paid in shot for different clearances. 5. We have gone through rival submissions. we find that the said issue has been decided by Tribunal in the appellant's own case in identical circumstances. In the said case, after examining the similar arguments placed by the appellan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 23.09.2002 does not supersedes or rescind the earlier Circular. The Circular prescribe the following procedure in such situation. (a) The refineries can generate on ARE-3 on quarterly basis for one product for one destination at the quarter within fifteen days of the end of the quarter. In other words, if "N" no. Of the petroleum product to "N" no. Of destinations, quarter, the refinery should be able to know the destination product wise (b) The receiving Commissioner ate at the tapping off points can issue the re-warehousing certificate AI per the receipt at their end. These re-warehousing certificates should be acceptable to jurisdictional Excise Officer at refinery end in the first instance, though provisionally.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "The above instruction takes into account that some quantity lies in the pipeline. Thus when first time some product is transmitted, there is likely shortage of receipt at the other end. If another consignment is subsequently transmitted naturally the quantity lining in the pipeline would reach the destination first and quantity from the new consignment is likely to remain in the pipeline. If same pipelines are used to transmit more than one product naturally some excess in one product and corresponding shortage in another is possible. As the Board has prescribed reconciliation on an annual basis there is no justification to change or deviate from the same. The appeal E/914/06 is allowed by way of remand with the direction that the ....