1998 (4) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... MS. S. V. MARUTHI J.---At the instance of the Revenue, the following questions are referred : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the amount realised by the sale of the assessee's interest in the property was only Rs. 4,33,960, i.e., Rs. 5,62,980 minus Rs. 1,29,020? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee was not vested with full interest in the property sold and capital gains be computed only with reference to the price realised towards his interest with property?" The assessee is an individual. The assessment year is 1982-83. The assessee carried on abkari business during the financial years 1970-71 and 1971-72. He mortgaged his immovable property to the State Excise Department as se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3,70,970 (Rs. 5,57,980---Rs. 1,87,010), while the assessee contended that the amount of Rs. 1,29,020 due to the State Excise Department is also to be deducted from Rs. 5,57,980 before computing the capital gains besides allowing deductions. Thus the net income from the capital gains is Rs. 85,130. The Income-tax Officer and the appellate authority has not agreed with the assessee and so the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y to the assessee. We agree with the view expressed by the Tribunal. The undisputed fact is that the property was mortgaged to the Government and thereby an interest in property is created in favour of the Government. When the property was sold by public auction the value of the property can be reduced to the extent of interest that was created in favour of the Government by mortgage. Therefore....