Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (11) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitions are filed by the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Tamil Nadu-III, Madras, under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for issuance of a direction to the Tribunal to state a case and refer the common questions of law, as below, for the opinion of this court : "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that while v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee, following the decision of the Supreme Court in CGT v. Kusumben D. Mahadevia (Smt.) [1980] 122 ITR 38 and the decision of this court in CWT v. Sabita Chandran (Smt.) [1985] 151 ITR 210 and CWT v. Sharbati Devi Jhalani [1990] 182 ITR 487 (Delhi). The Revenue appealed to the Tribunal. The Tribunal, in turn, following the decision of this court in K. M. Mammen v. WTO [1983] 139 ITR 357 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rajan, learned junior standing counsel for income-tax cases representing the Revenue, and Mr. Philip George, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, were heard. The said learned counsel representing the Revenue drew our attention to a recent decision of the apex court of this country in the case of Bharat Hari Singhania v. CWT [1994] 207 ITR 1, wherein their Lordships of the Supreme Cou....