Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1823

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JUDGMENT Anil Choudhary, Heard the learned AR for Revenue none appeared for appellant/assessee. 2. The learned AR for Revenue fairly agree that the issue involved in this appeal is already settled by this Tribunal in favour of the appellant/assessee vide final order No. 51048 of 2018dated 19/03/2018. The extract of the order is reproduced here-in-below :- "The present appeal is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal. 2. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, but the appellant has submitted written submission. Heard Shri R.K. Manjhi, learned DR, who justified the impugned order. 3. After hearing the Revenue as well as perusal of record, it appears that an identical issue has come-up for consideration before this Tribunal in the case of Superintendent of Po....