Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (2) TMI 31

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... referred the following question, for the opinion of this court, under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the "Act": "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on January 27....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the assessee, imposed a penalty of Rs. 32,000 under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, contending that sub-section (2) of section 274 of the Act providing for a reference to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner having been omitted with effect from April 1, 1976, by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, the power of the Inspecting Assistant Commissi....