Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (2) TMI 31

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nstance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following question, for the opinion of this court, under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the "Act": "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e imposed and after considering the reply by the assessee, imposed a penalty of Rs. 32,000 under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, contending that sub-section (2) of section 274 of the Act providing for a reference to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner having been omitted with effect from April 1, 1976, by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, the....