Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 852

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s in the impugned Tribunal order dated 24.05.2017. The mistake pointed out by the assessee in this M.P. is contained in para nos. 4 to 6 of the M.P. which are reproduced herein below for ready reference:- "4. During the course of hearing of the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal, the Authorized Representative of Winphoria India while defending its case had sought for exclusion of 8 comparable companies namely Exensys Software solutions Ltd, Sankhya Infotech Ltd., Four Soft Ltd, Thirdware Solution Ltd, Geometric Software Solutions Ltd, Tata Elxsi Ltd (seg), Flextronics (seg) and Infosys Ltd on the ground of functional dissimilarity. The Authorized Representative had substantiated its arguments before the Hon'ble Tribunal by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the jurisdictional Tribunal which was also submitted and relied upon by the Company at the time of hearing on April 3, 2017: * M/s Symbol Technologies India Pvt Ltd vs ACIT( IT(TP)A No.391/Bang/2012) - AY 2005-06 (Page 6 of the ruling) (Refer page 113 of the case law compendium) * M/s Sunquest Information Systems (India) Pvt Ltd( IT(TP)A No.1302/Bang/2011 & 92/Bang/2012) - AY 2005-06 (Page 10 of the ruling) (Page 85 of the case law compendium) The reasons and the judicial rulings mentioned above make it evident that Infosys Ltd is functionally not comparable to the business operation of the Company." 2. In course of hearing of the M.P., it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that in respect of assessee's arg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atior Technologies Ltd. (seg) 8. Igate Solutions Ltd.(seg.) 9. Flextronics Software Ltd.(seg) 10. L&T Infotech 11. atyam Computer Services Ltd. 12.  Infosys Technologies Ltd. 4. Now we reproduce Para 9.2 of the impugned Tribunal order which contains 7 names. This para reads as under. "9.2 On the other hand, learned authorized representative of the assessee sought exclusion of the following companies on the ground of functional dissimilarities: i. Exensys Software Solutions Ltd. ii. Sankhya Infotech Ltd. iii. Four soft Ltd. iv. Thirdware Solution Ltd. v. Geometric Software Solutions Ltd. vi. Tata Elxsi Ltd.(seg) vii. Flextronics (seg....