Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (12) TMI 54

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ght in law in coming to the conclusion that, the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on roads, culverts, drainage, etc., as plants (except those in residential localities) and not as 'buildings' ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the assessee was entitled to claim development rebate on water supply and library books ?" So far as the first question is concerned, the Tribunal has, following its earlier decision in ITA Nos. 9184 and 9185/Ahd. of 1975-76 for the assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70, held that roads, culverts and drainage, except those in the residential localities, should be treated as plant and not as buildings for the pu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s in respect of which, looking to the measure of their price, a provision has been made for allowing the entire cost as deductible expenses of the year in which such assets have been acquired rather than subject them to regular depreciation at fixed percentage. Discussion in this respect finds place in para. 16 of the Tribunal's order, which is reproduced hereinbelow: "The last ground is about the allowance of the development rebate on water supply and library books. The Revenue's argument is that the cost of some of these items have not (sic) been allowed as revenue expenditure being less than Rs. 750, no development rebate was admissible if the cost was zero. We do not agree with this because specific provision has been that instead of....