Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 1296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) Shri O.P. Agarwal, C.A. - for the appellants Shri Sanjay Jain, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the Respondent. ORDER Per. Rachna Gupta :- Arguments on the miscellaneous application praying for rectification in final order No. 58595-58596 of 2017 dated 11th December, 2017, heard. Shri O.P. Agarwal, learned Consultant for the applicants has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g these arguments, Shri Sanjay Jain, learned Departmental Representative has submitted that there is no error apparent on the record of the impugned orders, as is alleged. No doubt Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (supra) case has been relied upon but the order is clear about reasons for still interpreting the said case law to give the retrospective effect to the impugned amendments, the same being procedural....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppeal is not permissible. We draw our support from Sant Lal Gupta vs. Modern Cooperative Group Flouring Society Ltd. - 2010 (262) E.L.T. 6 (S.C.) wherein Hon'ble Apex court has held that whatever cannot be done directly either being prohibited by law, is not permissible to be done obliquely by an indirect and circuitous contrivance. 4. As a result of entire above discussion, we hereby hold that....