2018 (11) TMI 1286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Rajesh Ostwal i/b. PDS Legal, for the Appellant. Mr. Sham Walve with Ms. Maya Majumdar, for the Respondent. P.C: Looking into the limited controversy involved, Mr. Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. Walve, learned Counsel for the Respondent-Revenue, requested for final disposal of the Appeal. 2. Appellant was Respondent before the Customs Excise and Service....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... submitted that on account of communication gap, the Advocate could not remain present before the Tribunal on the date of hearing. This was the first date of hearing. It is not a case of consistent default by the Appellant or its Advocates. The Tribunal, therefore, ought to have given atleast one chance to allow the representation of the Appellant. Learned Counsel for the Appellant further submitt....