Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....BABU J.---According to the Revenue, the assessee should be penalised in anticipation of a likely violation. We are unable to appreciate this argument or subscribe to the same. The assessment year with which we are concerned is the assessment year 1986-87. The provisions of section 11(5) of the Income-tax Act were amended with retrospective effect from April 1, 1983, by the amending Act of 1991 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1, 1993, the assessee had not disinvested. That question will be relevant for the years subsequent to March 31, 1993, and not for earlier years. It is well settled law that a person, who has complied with the law as it exists, cannot be penalised by reason of the amendment to the law effected subsequently, unless such intention is expressly stated and the imposition of such penalty is not contr....