2015 (8) TMI 1459
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aria, Adv. JUDGMENT The Court : The submission on behalf of the company is that the petitioning-creditor has not been able to affirmatively establish its claim. The company indicates that the rates charged by the petitioning-creditor for the transport services rendered have been contemporaneously questioned as excessive by the company. The claim is to the tune of Rs. 3,87,49,003....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Rs. 1,89,926/- for a net claim of Rs. 3,87,49,003/-, the company disputed the claim and demanded that the work orders, invoices and other documentary evidence in support of the claim be supplied to it by the petitioner. The company's reply of May 8, 2014 was dealt with on behalf of the petitioner by advocate's letter of June 24, 2014 by which the petitioner enclosed some documents and maintained ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....draw the notices dated 17.04.2014 and 24.06.2014 issued by your advocate on your behalf and all legal cases filed, if any, in any forum. A line of confirmation in this regard will be appreciated." There does not appear to be any doubt as to the amount claimed to be due by the petitioning-creditor. It would be evident from the certificate of February 17, 2014 and the company's e-mail of July 15,....
TaxTMI