Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (12) TMI 1630

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri Jitendra Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : S.K. Mohanty, Member, J.]. - The applicant has filed this application for recalling the Final Order No. C/A/55545/2016, dated 22-11-2016 passed in Appeal No. C/581/2010-CU(DB). The reason explained in the application is that the appeal was decided ex parte, without proper notice of hearing to the respondent. 2. Ld. A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order stating as follows :- "None is present on behalf of the assessee. Matter is adjourned to 22nd November, 2016. Issue notice." 6. However, on perusal of the case records, we do not find any notice has been communicated to the respondent, fixing the date of hearing on 22-11-2016. Thus, we are of the view that Final Order dated 22-11-2016 passed by this Tribunal ex parte can be recall....