Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l nos. FPA-PMLA-1173/AHD/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1174/AHD/2016 have been filed against the order dated 24.11.2015. 2. The facts and legal issues in all appeals are similar thus by single order these are being disposed with the consent of the parties. 3. In O.C. No. 503/2015 dated 24.11.2015, the respondent no. 1 has made a search of cash of Rs. 6.47 Lacs approximately from house C-83, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur owned by the father of the appellants. 4. It is on record and also an admitted fact that the house at C-83, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur was owned by the father of the appellant. It is also an admitted fact that the appellant used to reside with his father, mother, brother and his family as a joint family in this house. 4.1 The panchnama dated 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that an authorization of search of the premises C-83, Shyam Nagar was given by the Joint Director, PMLA, AZU, Ahmedabad. It is stated by the appellant that integrity of the officer was doubtful as averted by his Director. When the said premises was found locked, the decision to break open the lock of the doors, safe, almirah etc. was taken by the Assistant Director, Jaipur Zonal Unit. Nothing is on record that any such permission in writing was ever granted by any officer of the rank of Deputy Director and above. This being against the basic spirit of Section 17(1) (iv) (b) of the Act. 8. Two separate impugned orders have been passed confirming the attachment. The main facts are taken from appeal no. FPA-PMLA- 1266/AHD/2016. 9. Couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gainst Shri Girish Parshottam Patel @ Tommy Patel, Kiran Jayantilal Mala, D.S. Chauhan @ Dharmin Chauhan and Chirag Parikh for commission of offence relating to obtaining SIM under forged IDs and signatures, being offence under Section 120 B r/w 418, 419, 420, 467 & 471 of IPC. Accordingly a case No ECIR/03/AZO/2015 dated 26.03.2015 was registered by the office of the Enforcement Directorate, Zonal Unit, Ahmedabad against these four persons. 10.1 During the course of investigation by Enforcement Directorate, it was allegedly noticed that these persons in the name and style of MARUTI AHMEDABAD had settled proceeds in betting of Cricket to the tune of Rs. 2469,99,08,750.00 from 01.12.2014 till 16.03.2015 by using these forged SIM cards. It....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellant through his counsel submitted a submission explaining the non applicability of the provisions of PMLA, 2002 against the appellant and requested to release the seized Assorted Jewelery and utensils valued at Rs. 85,08,920.00 and not to arbitrarily confirm the Provisional Attachment Order so issued in this regard. 11. The Counsel of the appellant has referred the grounds against confirmation of the impugned provisional attachment order along with evidence in its support, at the time of personal hearing. 12. It is stated that the Adjudicating Authority without taking on record any of the submissions; without any reasons, so recorded in writing; without refuting any of the contentions so made by the appellant; resorted to confi....