Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (11) TMI 25

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"), the Revenue seeks a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") to state the case and refer the following questions, stated to be of law, arising out of RA No. 374/ Delhi of 1997 in respect of the assessment year 1986-87, for the opinion of this court : "(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing to the earlier years but paid during the year was wrongly allowed by the Assessing Officer because the income from immovable property was not assessed under the head "Income from house property" as the assessee was not the legal owner thereof ; (ii) the assessee had not disclosed interest income on the amounts lying deposited in her compulsory deposit account ; and (iii) though the assessee ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rce of acquisition of jewellery declared under the amnesty scheme, the Tribunal held that there was no material on record to show that the jewellery was acquired in the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration and not in the year as mentioned by the assessee in her declaration under the amnesty scheme and, therefore, in the absence of any clear finding that income on accou....