2017 (11) TMI 1732
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) Shri Jatin Mahajan (Advocate) for Appellant Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh (Dy. Commr.) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary The above stated appeals are arising out of five impugned Orders-in-Appeal detailed in chart below and having a common issue. Therefore, they are taken up together for disposal. S. No. Appeal No. Party Name Order-in-Appeal Order-in-Original ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Do 53(MP)2010 Dated 16.09.2010 03.02.2010 June 09 - Sep 09 D - 4,89,111/- P - 4,89,111/- 7. E/1427/2011 Do Do 54(MP)2010 Dated 27.09.2010 15.04.2010 Oct 09 - Dec 09 D - 2,27,936/- P - 2,27,936/- 8. E/1431/2011 Do 52/CE/ALLD/2011 Dated 31.03.2011 07(MP)2010 Dated 24.01.2010 25.05.2009 Jun 08 - July 08 D - 4,01,890/- P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... 67/1995-CE for sugar syrup, as intermediate product, became inapplicable. Therefore, the appellants were issued with various show cause notices demanding Central Excise duty on intermediate product 'sugar syrup' captively consumed in the manufacture of biscuits. The said show cause notices were adjudicated through various Order-in-Originals where the demands were confirmed. Aggrieved by the said....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s. E/51610-51618/2015 and submitted that this Tribunal had allowed appeals by setting aside the impugned Order-in-Appeals in the said appeals. 4. Heard the learned AR who has agreed that the present appeals are squarely covered by Final Order of this Tribunal in above stated case. 5. Having considered the submissions made from both sides and on perusal of record, we find that this Tribunal i....
TaxTMI