2018 (10) TMI 1454
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... MR SIRAJ R GORI (2298) AND MR VARIS V ISANI (3858) For The Respondent : MR PRANAV TRIVEDI, AGP ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions are filed for challenging provisional orders of attachment passed by the respondent authorities attaching the petitioner's factory premises, stock and bank accounts. The facts behind such action of the respondents a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... has been in business since several years. In the past, no such allegation had been made. Statements of the director of the petitioner and other persons were recorded under duress. The petitioner has not indulged any bogus billing activity. The department has attached the petitioner's bank accounts, premises and stock thereby making it impossible for the petitioner to operate its business. The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ss activities. By freezing the petitioner's bank accounts and attaching the properties, the petitioner is temporarily rendered penalized. The petitioner cannot operate the business, cannot move the stock and cannot make payments. On reasonable terms, we propose to suspend the attachments. 5. In the process, we have taken note of the following facts: (i) As per the department, the p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ery are not encumbered. The same would therefore be poor security for any possible tax collection. 6. Under the circumstances, we would permit the petitioner to carry on the legitimate business by suspending provisional attachments subject to fulfillment of following conditions: (i) The petitioner creates an undertaking to maintain a stock of the goods of a minimum of Rs. 5 crores. Suc....
TaxTMI