2018 (6) TMI 1543
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Standing Counsel, Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun kumar, Mr. Vijay Kumar Ponna, Jr. S.C. For the Respondent : Mr. A. S. Sairaman for Mr. S. Sridhar JUDGMENT M.M.SUNDRESH, J. Aggrieved over the order passed by the Tribunal, by formulating the following substantial questions of law in respect of the assessment year 2004-2005, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal: "1.Whe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t is found that income from the property was having component for providing services and maintenance? 2.Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsels appearing for the parties would submit that after the remand order passed by the Tribunal, the assessing officer took the assessment for consideration and once again reiterated....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion Bench referred supra since two of the subsequent decisions have been taken note of notwithstanding the fact that the earlier order deals with the very same case of the assessee pertaining to the same assessment year. 5.We are of the view that the same cannot be a ground to allow this appeal. As stated earlier, as on today, the order of the Division Bench, as confirmed by the Apex Court woul....
TaxTMI