Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1543

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Standing Counsel, Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun kumar, Mr. Vijay Kumar Ponna, Jr. S.C. For the Respondent  : Mr. A. S. Sairaman for Mr. S. Sridhar JUDGMENT M.M.SUNDRESH, J. Aggrieved over the order passed by the Tribunal, by formulating the following substantial questions of law in respect of the assessment year 2004-2005, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal: "1.Whe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is found that income from the property was having component for providing services and maintenance? 2.Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsels appearing for the parties would submit that after the remand order passed by the Tribunal, the assessing officer took the assessment for consideration and once again reiterated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion Bench referred supra since two of the subsequent decisions have been taken note of notwithstanding the fact that the earlier order deals with the very same case of the assessee pertaining to the same assessment year. 5.We are of the view that the same cannot be a ground to allow this appeal. As stated earlier, as on today, the order of the Division Bench, as confirmed by the Apex Court woul....