Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (10) TMI 1176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that the action of the Assessing Officer in holding that the appellant is not registered u/s. 12A, is without jurisdiction. 2) The CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 28,79,704/- on the ground that the action of the Assessing Officer in holding that the appellant is not registered u/s. 12A, is without jurisdiction. 3. The facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust registered u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the assessment year 2012-13, the assessee filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs. Nil after claiming refund of Rs. 46,360/-. While framing the assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act, the Assessing Officer determined the total income as follows:   Excess of income over exp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... without jurisdiction. The CIT(A) observed that without cancelling registration u/s. 12A of the Act, the Assessing Officer cannot deny the benefit of section 11 and 12 of the Act. It was observed that the assessee had applied 85% of the receipt for the objectives of the Trust. Hence, the CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 59,14,791/-. Similarly, while deleting the addition of set apart amount of Rs. 28,79,704/-, the CIT(A) observed that since the assessee-Trust is duly registered u/s. 12A of the Act, the Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to hold that the assessee is not eligible for continuation of registration u/s. 11 of the Act and cannot be treated as AOP so as to tax the set apart amount in assessment year 2011-12 and to be taxed at....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Commissioner to consider the case of the assessee and pass necessary order u/s. 12AA(3) of the Act." 6.1 However, the CIT(A) could have directed the Assessing Officer to examine whether the activities carried on by the assessee is in accordance with the object clause of the Trust. Neither the CIT(A) nor the Assessing Officer have examined this issue. The Assessing Officer in this case, at the threshold, rejected the claim of the assessee under section 11 of the Act by observing that since the Trust has not obtained the approval of the Commissioner of Income-tax for amendments made by it in the memorandum and rules and regulations, and also not obtained prior approval for expanding its operations beyond the limits of the country, the T....