Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1978 (1) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....overy of Rs. 2,05,000/-. After the service of summonses on the defendant, Union of India. Shri A.S Narula, Government Pleader appeared in the trial Court on February 4, 1975 and got an adjournment for filing a written statement. The case was adjourned several times for the same purpose till July 19, 1976, when an application was moved under section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act for staying furt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... adjournment. 3. That case is, however, distinguishable on facts for the reason that no copy of the plaint was served with the summonses on the Government and the Government Pleader, it was found, had appeared without any instructions from the Government. 4. The present case is fully covered by a decision of the Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jan Saran, Kailash Chander . 1973 2 S....