2018 (10) TMI 1139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....9 - KERALA HIGH COURT - 2019 (20) G.S.T.L. 193 (Ker.)<br>KERALA HIGH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 16-10-2018<br>WA. No. 1907 of 2018 - -<br>GST<br>MR K.VINOD CHANDRAN AND MR ASHOK MENON, JJ. For The APPELLANT : SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) For The RESPONDENT : SRI N NAGARESH, ASGI AND SRI MOHAMMED RAFIQ, SR GP JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. The Writ Appeal is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ge against the Rule. We were of the opinion that the interim application had to be considered first and in the Writ Petition notice had to be issued before the challenge to the Rule was considered. We, hence, directed the appellant to file a review before the learned Single Judge. The same has been filed and is pending before the learned Single Judge. 3. At this point, the learned Counsel appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on 10.09.2018. We notice that the detention itself was on 09.09.2018 and the subsequent uploading of the Part-B would not efface the defect as pointed out by the Detaining Officer. In such circumstances, we find that the judgment of the learned Single Judge, insofar as refusing the release of the vehicle on the basis of the judgment in W.P.(C) No.26986/2018, produced as Annexure I, is perfectly i....