Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (10) TMI 1101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellant sought adjournment when no date was granted and informed to fix date of hearing through fresh notice. (b) No notice of hearing fixing the date for 27-03- 2018 was ever received. (c) Under the statutory provisions of section 250 it is essential to fix a date and place of hearing of the appeal by giving notice through the appellant and the AO but no such notice was served on the assessee/appellant or on his authorised representative. 2. That the order of the Ld, CIT(A) is liable to be quashed being bad in law as reasonable and sufficient opportunity was not provided to the assessee/appellant. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A) has further failed to appreciate that assessment made u/s 147/144 is bad in law bec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the basis of AIR information initiated the proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and issued notice to the assessee u/s 148 of the Act. Since, there was no compliance, the AO framed the assessment at an income of Rs. 37,45,000/-. 5. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter to the ld. CIT(A) who dismissed the appeal ex-parte for non-prosecution by observing as under: "2. The appeal of the appellant was fixed for hearing for 14.03.2018 and again for 27.03.2018. There has been no response. Neither the appellant has entered appearance nor any request for adjournment has been received. As the appellant is not keen on prosecuting its appeal the same is dismissed for want of prosec....