2005 (8) TMI 726

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hy, Advocate , Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Advocate. O R D E R This Petition was heard in detail on 4.7.2005, 5.7.2005, 6.7.2005, 11.7.2005, 19.7.2005 and 28.7.2005. Proceedings could not be concluded because on one occasion Mr.V.Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate was not available. Thus, there is no scope for contending that a prima facie case had not been made out for the continuance of anti-dumping duties. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce of a prima facie case was evident to al Conditional on the Petitioner filing its Appeal before Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) within a period of fifteen days from today, the Notification dated 19.7.2005 shall remain stayed till the date on which the Tribunal fixes the matter for public hearing. Mr.Tiku, learned counsel for the UOI, states that this Court may direct ....