2018 (10) TMI 977

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... petitioner. Mr. Advait Sethna with Mr. Ashish Mehta, Ms. Karishma Ahuj and Ms. Hema Chhabra i/b. Mr. Ashish Mehta. for the respondents. P.C.: At the request of the parties, the petition is being disposed of finally at the stage of admission. 2. The challenge in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is restricted, on instructions by Mr.D'souza, the learned co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... same was done by one Ajay Mishra without his knowledge and in that context the proceedings are pending before a Criminal Court. The impugned order August 11, 2017, after recording the petitioner's submission, merely states that the same is not accepted without any reasons. 4. As against this, Mr.Sethna, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents supports the impugned order dated Aug....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lone injects objectivity in deciding the appeal / dispute. Moreover, this alone would let the parties know as to why its submissions are not accepted so as to effectively challenge it before the superior forum. Moreover, the superior forum would have the advantage of knowing the reasons which weighed with the authority in accepting or not accepting a particular submission. Thus reasons are the lif....