2018 (10) TMI 952
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Punj, Advocate For Respondent (s): Shri V. Gupta, AR ORDER Per: Mr. Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order and claiming the refund of Rs. 31,77,267/- which has been rejected by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is manufacture of Pesticides and Insecticides in the packing of less than 10gms/10ml. The appellant....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s correctly paid the duty. As the refund claim was rejected by the authorities below, therefore, the appellant is before us. 3. Today when the matter was called. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant made a statement that the appellant is seeking limited relief from this Tribunal for sanctioning the refund claim of Rs. 29,39,465/- along with interest thereon. Rest of the claim made by the appellant....
TaxTMI