Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (2) TMI 62

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The facts giving rise to this appeal, briefly, are as follows : The respondent-company is a pharmaceutical company. It took over the assets of the Indian branch of May and Baker Limited, U. K. on January 1, 1975. In the original returns for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78, the respondent did not claim depreciation on the assets of the Indian branch. However, for the assessment yea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oints also debatable was the applicability of rule 10. However, if one goes into the terms of the settlement, it is clear that finally in order to buy peace an ad hoc figure of underassessment was arrived at and it was accepted by the assessee. On the basis of this ad hoc figure of underassessment the Department now contends that the assessee was guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars and tha....