2018 (10) TMI 645

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ber (Technical) Shri Dharmendra Srivastava (CA) for Appellant Shri Mohd Altaf (Asstt. Commr.) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa Both the appeals are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned order passed by the authorities below and related to the same set of facts and circumstance. After hearing both the sides, we note that appellant is ru....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and also of Rs. 10,81,034/- on the ground that they have already paid VAT on the said service, as per the order of the VAT Authorities. The said refund claim stand denied by the authorities below on the ground of limitation as also on unjust enrichment. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the subsequent to the confirmation of the VAT, they have deposited the same with t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m the relevant date. He further submits that the authorities working under the Act are bound by the provisions of the Act and there is no rule or authority to extend the said period, even if the denial of refund results in undue orders against the assessee. 5. We fully agree with the above contentions of the learned AR. There is no dispute that the refund claims stand filed after the normal per....