Appellate authority misinterprets Rule 25 as typographical error; original order clearly intended penalty u/r 25.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error and the intention was to impose penalty under Rule 26, because in the Order-in-Original, the lower authority has discussed as to why penalty is liable to be imposed under rule 25....