Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (1) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Income-tax Act, 1961, has stated a case and referred the following questions stated to be of law and to arise out of its order dated August 9, 1989, passed in I. T. A. No. 500 (All) of 1988 for the assessment year 1985-86 for the opinion of this court : "1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the jurisdiction under section 263 was rightly and legally invoked by the Commissioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aid the disputed amount of tax before filing the return in terms of proviso to section 43B. The proviso came into effect from April 1, 1988 and the question was whether it was retrospective in nature so as to apply to assessment year 1985-86. In the supplementary statement of the case, the Tribunal has stated that an amount of Rs. 3,21,172.23 was deposited by the assessee on April 30, 1984, i.e., ....