2018 (10) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he petitioner Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondent   1. By consent of the parties, the petition is taken for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the minutes of meetings / orders dated 1st August, 2017 and 6th December, 2017 of the Policy Relaxation Committee in the office of the Director General of Fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions by producing other corroborative evidence in the form of ARE-1 which would establish the fulfillment of their export obligations by making supplies to SEZ. In fact, it is submitted that an identical issue had came up before this Court in Larsen and Tubro Ltd. (2018) 360 E.L.T. 289 from the orders of the Policy Relaxation Committee on identical facts and law and this Court allowed the petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion Committee of respondent no.2. 5. However, Mr. Jetly is unable to point out any distinguishing features in this case from that existing in Larsen and Tubro Ltd. (supra) which would warrant our taking a different view in this petition. Therefore, for the reasons indicated in our order in Larsen and Tubro Ltd. (supra) this petition is allowed. 6. Accordingly, the impugned minutes / orders d....