Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 1742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Assessee : Shri Kirit Sheth ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order dated 28th December 2016, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-52, Mumbai, deleting penalty of Rs. 74,00,477 imposed under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") for the assessment year 2008-09. 2. The only effective ground raised by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e total income was determined at Rs. 7,40,04,778. While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer also initiated proceedings for imposition of penalty under section 271AAA of the Act. In response to the show cause notice issued for imposition of penalty under section 271AAA of the Act, though, the assessee filed its explanation on 22nd March 2013, however, the Assessing Officer rejecting th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6. The learned Departmental Representative strongly supporting the decision of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) also relied upon the following decisions:- i) DCIT v/s M/s. K.G. Developers, ITA no.1139/Ahd./ 2012, dated 13.09.2013; ii) DCIT v/s Jain Co. Developers Pvt. Ltd., ITA no.6379/Del./2016 dated 12.02.2018; and iii) DCIT v/s Sam India Abhimanyu Housing, ITA no.12....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eding is, a person concerned must have been subjected to a search and seizure operation under section 132(1) of the Act. Undisputedly, in the facts of the present case, no search and seizure operation under section 132(1) of the Act was carried out in case of the assessee. This fact is clearly evident from the initiation and completion of proceedings under section 153C of the Act. Thus, the primar....