Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 1274

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hajan (Advocate) for Appellant Shri Pawan Kumar Singh (Supdt.) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.289-ST/APPL/KNP/2012 dated 25/10/2012 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Kanpur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were engaged in manufacture of biscuits. App....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issioner (Appeals) did not appreciate the arguments and did not interfere with the order passed by the Original Authority confirming the demand and imposing penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994. However, since penalty under said Section 78 was imposed, learned Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved by the said order appell....