Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (10) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....This order will govern WTRs Nos. 83 to 86 of 1978 arising out of WTRAs Nos. 1467 to 1470 of 1975-76, WTRs Nos. 148 to 152 of 1982 arising out of WTAs Nos. 1003 to 1006/D of 1980 and 1009/D of 1980, WTR No. 45 of 1983 arising out of WTA No. 53/Delhi of 1981, WTR No. 84 of 1983 arising out of WTA No. 120/Delhi of 1991, WTR No. 85 of 1983 arising out of WTA No. 51/Delhi of 1981, WTR No. 92 of 1983 ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....figure of wealth included is different, essentially the issues are the same. Taking note of Suit No. 219 of 1972 titled Saiyid Sirajul Hasan v. Syed Murtaza Ali Khan and others filed in this court, as a protective measure the concerned sum was included while computing net wealth for the concerned assessment year 1974-75 under section 16(3) of the Act. Such inclusion was challenged by the concerned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has been rightly observed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner protective inclusion of wealth is permissible where a substantive assessment is made in the hands of another. There was no definite finding recorded by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner or the Tribunal as to whether there was any substantive inclusion in the hands of any other person so far as the wealth in question is concerned....