2018 (9) TMI 590

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. ORDER Heard Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V. Sundareswaran, Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue. 2. The petitioner seeks for a direction upon the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 24-8-2017 and refund a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/-, which was pre-deposited by the petitioner vide order dated 2-9-2010 with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... which reads as follows : "1. Whether the first respondent authority and the second respondent Tribunal is correct in holding that the charges of Section 112(a) & (b) of Customs Act, 1962 is made out in the facts and circumstances of the case against the appellant, warranting imposition of penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs? 2. Is the 2nd respondent Tribunal right in attaching importance to t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....een considered, the petitioner has come before this Court. The second respondent by a note addressed to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Legal Cell, Customs House, Chennai, has stated that the details sought for are not readily available and the second respondent needs some time to construct the bundle. Hence, adjournment by thirty (30) days is sought for. Unfortunately, the department is un....