2018 (9) TMI 544
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... COURT - TMI<br>MADRAS HIGH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 21-8-2018<br>Writ Petition No. 21272 of 2018 And WMP. Nos. 24940 & 24941 of 2018 - -<br>GST<br>Mr. K. Ravichandrabaabu J. For the Petitioner : Mr.Velayutham Pichaiya For the Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar Standing Counsel for R1 to R5 Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, Standing Counsel for R6 Mrs. G.Dhana Madhi, Government ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... pertains to the General Construction Services and therefore, the petitioner will not fall under such services. By contending so, the petitioner made a representation dated 14.06.2018 before the fifth respondent seeking clarification, more particularly, with regard to the relevant Chapter Heading applicable to the case of the petitioner. It is stated that the said representation is not considered ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uch representation before the concerned Official and if any such representation is made, the same will be addressed accordingly. 6. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances, more particularly, by considering the fact that the petitioner has raised an issue with regard to the Chapter Heading in consonance with the work executed by him, certainly, it is for the authorities concerned t....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI