2017 (10) TMI 1363

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Dr. Vineet Kothari, J. 1. Petitioner-assessee has filed this writ petition with the following prayers:-  "(a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents No. 2 and 5 not to enforce recovery of the dues confirmed vide order dated 15.03.2016 passed by the Respondent No. 2 till disposal of the Appeal No. ITA 146 before the Respondent No. 3, vide Annexure-F; ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any such order in the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. The only prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that Respondent - Income Tax Department should not take the coercive action for recovery of disputed demand, which has been raised on account of high handed and arbitrary additions made to the declared income of the petitioner-Company, atleast till the stay application fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to accept notice and copy of the petition has been supplied to him. 5. Mr. Jeevan Neeralgi, pointed out vide Annexure-J order dated 26.4.2016, that the Assessing Authority, viz., Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD), Circle 4(1)(1), Bangalore himself has already granted an interim stay to the petitioner-assessee restraining the recovery subject to payment of 15% of the demand before 30.4.20....